Search
C H I P S T O N E
SocialMediaBW.gif
Sam Margolin
“And Freedom to the Slave”: Antislavery Ceramics, 1787–1865

In February 1788 Josiah Wedgwood sent the president of the Pennsylvania
Society for the Abolition of Slavery “a few Cameos on a subject which is
daily more and more taking possession of men’s minds on this side of the
Atlantic as well as with you.” Accordingly, Wedgwood added “it gives me
great pleasure to be embarked on this occasion in the same great and good
cause with you, Sir.” The president of the Pennsylvania society was
Benjamin Franklin and the “great and good cause” to which Wedgwood
referred was the eradication of human bondage.
[1]

The jasperware cameos featured the image of a kneeling, black male slave
in chains, a design modeled by William Hackwood and adopted by the
Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in 1787 for use in its seal (fig.
1). Wedgwood reproduced the image for the founding of the society and
donated the cameos to friends and supporters of the cause.
[2]

Wedgwood’s dedication to the antislavery movement developed in the
context of prevailing Enlightenment influences. He was closely associated
with the Lunar Society of Birmingham, composed of men who shared not
only a passion for scientific inquiry but also an interest in social and
industrial progress. In 1773 society member Thomas Day published The
Dying Negro, an epic poem which may have influenced Wedgwood to
become actively involved in suppression of the slave trade.

Thomas Clarkson, one of Britain’s leading abolitionists, indicated how the
cameos came to be widely disseminated, publicly visible, and a valuable
means of promoting the cause (fig.
2). Women, he reported, had them
incorporated into bracelets and hairpins so that eventually “the taste for
wearing them became general.” The medallions were also set into boxes,
and artisans applied the design to a variety of objects including plates,
pitchers, patch and snuff boxes, tea caddies, and tokens (fig.
3). “Thus
fashion,” observed Clarkson, “which usually confines itself to worthless
things, was seen for once in the honourable offce of promoting the cause of
justice, humanity and freedom.”
[3]

African Images in English Society
Promoting the cause was a task made all the more diffcult, however, by the
less than complimentary manner in which blacks were often portrayed in
Anglo-American culture. Much of the negative attitude derived from the
specific and powerful meanings that English society associated with the
word “black” well before the introduction of Africans to England in the
1550s. Some pre-sixteenth-century definitions in the Oxford English
Dictionary including “deeply stained...dirty, malignant...foul, iniquitous,
atrocious, horrible, wicked,” exemplify decidedly negative connotations.
Consistent with this view, Queen Elizabeth I sought to banish blacks from
the kingdom in 1601, declaring her “discontent...at the great numbers of
negars and Blackamoors which...are crept into this realm.”
[4] But the very
fact that the population of Africans (whose immigration to the country was
by no means voluntary) was increasing suggests that not everyone in
England was repulsed by their presence. In fact, blacks were gaining
popularity among the English gentry as domestic servants and status
symbols, a fashion trend that continued throughout the seventeenth and
most of the eighteenth centuries.

Contemporary paintings of English aristocrats often included black
attendants, generally ascribing to the Africans a status comparable to that
of household pets. These graphic representations generally depicted the
servant either gazing earnestly at his or her white master or mistress or as
a “mute background figure...unnoticed and unacknowledged...barely more
than a blob of black paint, a shadowy figure with no personality or
expression.”
[5] The black servants portrayed in mid-eighteenth-century
Staffordshire figural groups typically display unflattering, almost apelike
characteristics: protruding lower jaw, low and massive brow, and
exceptionally long arms (fig.
5). This diminished image of the black servant
was further reinforced by the mass production of the late eighteenth-
century transfer print of The Tea Party in which the features of the pet dog
appear to have been rendered with greater care than those of the black
houseboy (fig.
6).

Africans in English society appear to have been as much objects of curiosity
and fascination as disdain, however. In addition to their appearance on
trade cards, maps, and coats of arms, figures of African adults and children
were employed on signboards, ubiquitous in eighteenth-century London, to
advertise occupations as varied as those of cheesemongers, haberdashers,
and oilmen.
[6] The particular motifs of the blackamoor’s head (usually in
profile) and the black boy (or, occasionally, the black girl) have been
identified as characteristic of the linen drapers and pewterers, respectively.
Both designs also were widely used by tobacconists and public houses, or
pubs, as mention of the “Black Boy in Bucklersbury” tavern in Ben Jonson’s
early seventeenth-century play Bartholomew’s Fair suggests (Act 1, scene
1).
[7] Such images may not have been quite as omnipresent in America, but
references such as the 1735 newspaper announcement of a Philadelphia
merchant relocating to Market Street under “the sign of the Black Boy”
indicate that they certainly existed (fig.
4).[8]

While many of these representations were patronizing to various degrees,
not all were inherently derogatory or condescending. The use of African
images in conjunction with heraldic crests conveys a sense of dignity, even
nobility, conforming to contemporary European notions of the “noble
savage” (figs.
7, 8, 9 and 10). But whether portrayed as pet-like servants,
quaintly exotic figures, or noble savages, such depictions of Africans in
Anglo-American popular culture all failed to convey the harsh and often
brutal realities of chattel slavery in America and the West Indies (fig.
11).

Abolition Images
To persuade others of the rightness of their cause, abolitionists first had to
make a convincing case for the essential humanity of black people. Perhaps
it was for this reason that the Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade
chose the specific wording “Am I Not a Man and a Brother” for use on its
seal and, consequently, Wedgwood’s cameo. Before Englishmen and
Americans could regard slaves as brothers, they would first have to
consider them human beings.

In the late eighteenth century, however, evangelical and Enlightenment
influences gave rise to a growing impulse toward humanitarianism and a
mood of sentimentality that produced greater empathy with the slave’s
plight.
[9] Among the foremost literary efforts was William Cowper’s seven-
stanza poem The Negro’s Complaint, cited by Clarkson as an influential
popular work that spread throughout England “where it was sung as a
ballad; and where it gave a plain account of the subject, with an
appropriate feeling, to those who heard it.”
[10]

Employing a combination of visual imagery and verse, nineteenth-century
British potters produced a variety of wares designed to arouse sympathy
for the slave. Many themes were evoked, including depictions of the
anguish of family separation and graphic portrayals of slavery’s horrors
(figs.
12, 13, 14, 15 and 16). Other ceramic pieces reveal a more subtle
approach to promoting the abolitionist cause. One strategy was to
incorporate the message into the familiar, traditional form of the rhyming
couplet commonly applied to English hollow ware (fig.
17). A popular verse
that has its origins in the eighteenth century but was employed on later
nineteenth-century earthenware proclaims:

Health to the Sick
Honour to the Brave
Success attend true Love
And Freedom to the Slave

Certain designs used by both British and other European potters not only
aroused sympathy for slaves but also goaded supporters of the abolitionist
cause to positive action. One option open to the average consumer was to
refuse to purchase goods produced by slaves. William Fox’s 1791
pamphlet, An Address to the People of Great Britain on the Propriety of
Abstaining from West India Sugar & Rum, apparently provided the impetus
for just such a campaign.
[11] This early example of what came to be known
as a “boycott” in the late nineteenth century is manifest in the injunction
enameled on early nineteenth-century earthenware and bone china not to
buy West Indian sugar that had been brought to market through the
exploitation of slave labor (figs.
18, 19).

01MB.jpg
[1] The Selected Letters of Josiah
Wedgwood, edited by Anne Finer and
George Savage (London: Cory, Adams,
and Mackay, 1965), p. 311; Robin Reilly,
Josiah Wedgwood 1730–1795 (London:
Macmillan, 1992) p. 287.
[2] Reilly, Wedgwood, p. 286.
Figure 1  Medallion, Josiah Wedgwood, Staffordshire, England,
ca. 1787. Jasperware. D. 1 1/8". (Chipstone Foundation; photo,
Gavin Ashworth.) Design of chained and kneeling slave in
profile taken from the seal of the Society for the Abolition of
the Slave Trade.
[3] Thomas Clarkson, The History of the
Rise, Progress, and accomplishment of
the Abolition of the African Slave-Trade
by the British Parliament (1808; reprint,
London: Frank Cass & Co., 1968), p. 192.
[4] David Dabydeen, Hogarth’s Blacks:
Images of Blacks in Eighteenth-Century
English Art (Athens, Ga.: University of
Georgia Press, 1987), pp. 21–26. See
also Hugh Honour, The Image of the
Black in Western Art, vol. 4, From the
American Revolution to World War I,
part 1, Slaves and Liberators
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1989).
[5] Dabydeen, Hogarth’s Blacks, p. 18.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Ambrose Heal, The Signboards of Old
London Shops: A Review of the Shop
Signs employed by the London Tradesmen
during the XVIIth and XVIIIth Centuries
(New York: Benjamin Blom, Inc., 1972),
pp. 21–22. Jacob Larwood and John C.
Hotten, The History of Signboards, from
the Earliest Times to the Present Day, 6th
ed. (London: John C. Hotten, n.d.), p.
432. Preface dated June 1866.

[8] Phillip Lapansky, “Graphic Discord:
Abolitionist and Antiabolitionist Images” in
The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women’s
Political Culture in Antebellum America,
edited by Jean Fagan Yellin and John C.
Van Horne (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
University Press, 1994), p. 216.

[9] Winthrop D. Jordan, The White Man’s
Burden: Historical Origins of Racism in the
United States (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1982), pp. 142–43;
Betty Fladeland, Men and Brothers: Anglo-
American Antislavery Cooperation
(Urbana: University of Illinois Press,
1972), p. 13.

[10] Clarkson, Abolition of the African
Slave-Trade, pp. 190–91.

[11] William Fox, An Address to the
People; Correspondence of Josiah
Wedgwood 1781–1794 (Didsbury,
Manchester, Eng.: E. J. Morten Ltd,
1906), 3: 183.

[12] Ibid., p. 183.
02MB.jpg
Figure 2  Medallion, Josiah Wedgwood, Staffordshire, England,
ca. 1787. Jasperware and silver. D. 1 7/8". (Collection of Rex
Stark; photo, Gavin Ashworth.)
03MB.jpg
Figure 3  Patch box, England, ca. 1800. Painted enamel on
metal. L. 1 3/4". (Collection of Rex Stark; photo, Gavin
Ashworth.)

Figure 4  Halfpenny token, 1668. Copper. D. 7/8". (Collection of the author; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) Head of black youth representing the Black Boy Pub.
Figure 5  Figural group, Staffordshire England, ca. 1760. Creamware. H. 5 3/8". (Courtesy, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.)

Figure 6  Cream jug, Staffordshire or Yorkshire, England, 1780–1790. Creamware. H. 4 1/2". (Collection of the author; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) This jug, part of a larger tea service, has twisted strap handles with molded sprigs terminals and a black transfer print of The Tea Party.

Figure 7  Jug, England, ca. 1800. Pearlware. H. 9 1/2". (Collection of the author; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) Armorial crest featuring blackamoor bust in profile.
Figure 8  Detail of the crest illustrated in figure 7.

Figure 9  Soup plate, France, ca. 1810. Porcelain. D. 9 3/4". (Collection of the author; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) Blackamoor head and legend “Asgre
Lan Diogel ei Pherchen.”

Figure 10  Detail of the soup plate illustrated in fig. 9. The Latin legend translates as “A pure conscience is a safeguard to its possessor.”

Figure 11  Detail of an engraving, from Thomas Clarkson’s History of the Abolition of the African Slave Trade, London, 1807. Influential figures such as Thomas Clarkson were given the responsibility of collecting information to support the abolition of the slave trade. This included interviewing 20,000 sailors and obtaining equipment used on the slave ships such as iron handcuffs, leg-shackles, thumb screws, instruments for forcing open slaves’ jaws, and branding irons. In 1787 he published his pamphlet, A Summary View of the Slave Trade and of the Probable Consequences of Its Abolition. After the abolishment of the British slave trade in 1807, Clarkson published his book History of the Abolition of the African Slave Trade.

Figure 12  Child’s mug, England, ca. 1840. Whiteware. H. 2 1/2". (Collection of Rex Stark; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) This enamel-colored black transfer print depicts the capture of native Africans by European slavers, along with the opening verse from William Cowper’s The Negro’s Complaint: “Forcd from home and all its pleasures/Afric’s coast we left forlorn/To increase a stranger’s treasures/O’er the raging billows borne.”

Figure 13  Jug, Staffordshire or Sunderland, ca. 1820. Pearlware. H. 4 1/2". (Collection of Rex Stark; photo Gavin Ashworth.) This jug with copper and pink luster trim shows a transfer-printed variation of the Wedgwood plaque design. This one features a frontal view of a chained and seated slave, and verses from William Cowper’s The Negro’s Complaint on the other side. Note the reversal, most likely unintentional, of “I” and “Not” in the printed motto.

Figure 14  Detail of the reverse of the jug illustrated in fig. 13. This stanza from The Negro’s Complaint reads (italics mine): “Slaves of gold, whose sordid dealings/ Tarnish all your boasted powers,/Prove that you have human feelings/Ere you proudly question ours!”

Figure 15  Figural group, France or England, ca. 1820. Porcelain. H. 6 1/4". (Collection of Rex Stark; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) A late eighteenth-century antislavery pamphlet by William Fox included a section on punishment in which a Royal Navy admiral attested that the flogging of slaves was much more severe than that administered to sailors aboard English men-of-war. More explicitly, an English general asserted “there is no comparison between regimental flogging, which only cuts the skin, and the plantation, which cuts out the flesh.”

Figure 16  Reverse view of the figural group illustrated in fig. 15.

Figure 17  Mug, England, ca. 1850. Porcelain H. 3". (Collection of Rex Stark; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) In elaborate gold script: “Health to the Sick/ Honour to the Brave/Success attend true Love/ And Freedom to the Slave.”

Figure 18  Sugar bowl, England, 1820–1830. Bone china. H. 4 5/8". (Courtesy, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.) The decoration of the kneeling slave in the tropical environment is enameled over the glaze suggesting that it may have been produced for a special anti-slavery fair or occasion.
Figure 19  Reverse of the sugar bowl illustrated in fig. 18. Legend reads: “East India Sugar not made/By Slaves/By Six families using/East India, instead of/West India Sugar, one/Slave less is required.” The wording represents a somewhat sanitized version of Fox’s formulation that “A family that uses 5 lb. of sugar per week...will, by abstaining from the consumption 21 months, prevent the slavery or murder of one fellow creature” and tactfully omits the pamphleteer’s more gruesome analogy “that in every pound of sugar used...we may be considered as consuming two ounces of human flesh.”

04MB.jpg
Figure 4  Halfpenny token, 1668. Copper. D. 7/8". (Collection
of the author; photo, Gavin Ashworth.) Head of black youth
representing the Black Boy Pub.
Ceramics in America 2002
Show all Figures only
Contents
Notes:
• Sliding/scrolling colums left and right of article
colum for the foot notes and for the figures.
• figs in text anchored to the images in left
column.